2008
Jan 
11

In My Humble Opinion…

Filed under: Politics — Mike Lawton @ 15:40  

This is the post in which I, Michael Lawton, will attempt to piss off as many people as possible, further ensuring any future political aspirations will be inevitably and irreparably coloured by the insane ramblings of his 29 year old ignorant, egotistical, pathetic need for self-important outbursts.


These people actually exist!


OK, maybe I’m exaggerating a little bit, but the point I’d like to make is how difficult it seems to be these days for anyone to hold and voice an opinion on something without worrying about coming across as a fool. Magnifying this is just how foolish those that DO proudly and loudly express themselves tend to appear. The rational tend to speak more softly, acknowledge that there may be other valid opinions, admit when information is not perfect or complete, then try to honestly explain why they came to the conclusion they reached. The foolish wave placards, shout slogans, and typically have little to no understanding of any information that does not conform to the opinion they, in most cases, were directed to have by another party with their own agenda.

Example: I do not think that the United States nor it’s partner countries should cease their military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan at the current time. *note: I am Canadian, and while we are actively involved in Afghanistan, we are only peripherally supporting the forces in Iraq.

Talk about a fun one to come out in favour of! It’s a little easier to have this discussion in Canada, since there isn’t as massive a social/political schism around the issue as there is in the US. On the other hand, being one step removed tends to make it easier for those who chose to do so to stereotype: Stay in Iraq = Bush supporter = crazed ignorant racist uneducated gun-toting ultra-neo-conservative super-fundamentalist-Evangelical-Christian redneck, right? Think there’s any chance I’m basing my opinion solely on what I consider the likely ramifications of withdrawing an arguably stabilizing force from a volatile and demonstrably UNstable region?

Does this mean that I agree 100% with the decisions that led to the West’s present involvement in these conflicts?

Does this have anything to do with my opinions on gay marriage, immigration, capital gains tax, oil tariffs, environmental policy, copyright reform, domestic surveillance, racial profiling, gun control, or tie colour?

Example: I think that the current US administration is an embarrassment to all the things they claim to stand for; an embarrassment to conservatives, an embarrassment to Christians, and an embarrassment to Americans. *note: remember, I’m Canadian, which means that I do have a filtered view of the political landscape in our neighbouring country. I do hope that I have a balanced enough perspective to take what I see in a proper context.

This is most likely the wrong place to invite debate over such an issue. While the breadth of the internet offers the potentially greatest diversity of opinion and input, the sad fact is that the most obnoxious contributors simply exhaust the enthusiasm of those interested in honest discourse (see John Gabriel’s Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory, or pretty much any comment thread or popular forum that touches on the slightest political or cultural activity).

I love a good honest passionate debate between people able to separate their emotions from their discourse. The mark of a truly skilled debater is one who can choose any side of a discussion and offer meaningful, intelligent insight, regardless of his or her personal feelings on the matter.

“Stay at home in your mind. Don’t recite other people’s opinions. I hate quotations. Tell me what you know.” ~Ralph Waldo Emerson

“And it’s my opinion, and that’s only my opinion, you are a lunatic. Just because there are a few hundred other people sharing your lunacy with you does not make you any saner.” ~Oleg Kiselev

“Opinions are like assholes. Everyone’s got one, and they all stink.” ~unknown

If you could blow up the world with the flick of a switch
Would you do it?
If you could make everybody poor just so you could be rich
Would you do it?
If you could watch everybody work while you just lay on your back
Would you do it?
If you could take all the love without giving any back
Would you do it?
And so we cannot know ourselves or what we’d really do…

With all your power
With all your power
With all your power
What would you do?

If you could make your own money and then give it to everybody
Would you do it?
If you knew all the answers and could give it to the masses
Would you do it?
No no no no no no are you crazy?
It’s a very dangerous thing to do exactly what you want
Because you cannot know yourself or what you’d really do

With all your power
With all your power
With all your power

The Yeah Yeah Yeah Song by The Flaming Lips

2007
Dec 
10

You Need To Know What’s Happening: Canadian Copyright Law and Political Piracy

Filed under: Canada,Politics — Mike Lawton @ 11:45  

If you care at all about Canadian musicians, writers, TV or film workers, or any other artist… you need to know what is happening.

If you care about your own rights with regards to music you listen to, movies you watch, literature you read, software you use… you need to find out about the new legislation being proposed by the federal government.

If you care about who is influencing our politicians, and who’s interests our laws are being written to protect… you need to think very hard about what this new proposal says.

If you don’t (or even if you do) understand terms and acronyms like DRM, DMCA, EULA, WIPO, P2P, Open Source, Creative Commons, and Fair Use… how confident are you that your politicians understand how they affect you as an individual (as opposed to what they are told about them by those that can afford lobbyists)?

(For a great explanation of what some of these concepts are and what this proposed legislation might mean to us, check out this slideshow by Wellington Grey about what has happened in the US.)

Laws that are written under the influence of foreign parties with commercial interests, and without public input, forced through without proper debate, education, or review, that directly affect nearly every citizen, and are modeled after a foreign act that has been a near total failure on every level… can not be tolerated.

People and organizations that benefit from this type of political piracy depend on a lazy and uninformed public. I beg you, educate yourself, then at least you’ll know why you’re so pissed off!

 

via Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow on 12/2/07


Canadian copyfightin’ law prof Michael Geist has revisited his list of “30 things you can do to stop the Canadian DMCA” — first posted the last time the Canadian government tried to bring down a US-style copyright law. The US’s approach to enforcing copyright in the digital age has resulted in 20,000 lawsuits against music fans, technology companies being sued out of existence for making new multi-purpose tools, and has not put one penny into the pocket of an artist or reduced downloading one bit. The USA stepped into uncharted territory in 1998 with the DMCA and fell off a cliff — that was reckless, but following them off the cliff is insane.

The Canadian minority Tory government is planning to do just that, first thing in the New Year, with a full-court press for a Canadian DMCA that goes way beyond the US counterpart, making it one of the worst copyright laws in the developed world, with extra-strong anti-circumvention rules that prohibit making and using tools that open up locked digital files, even when those files belong to you.

The last two Canadian Members of Parliament who championed a Canadian DMCA lost their jobs. Good things come in threes.

# Write to your local Member of Parliament. Nothing is more obvious or more important. Letters (which are better than email) from just a handful of constituents is enough to get the attention of your local MP. It is often a good idea to ask the MP to forward your letter to the relevant Ministers. Contact information for all MPs is available here. Online Rights Canada also provides an easy way to write to your local MP.

# Write to the Prime Minister of Canada. Contact information here.

# Write to Jim Prentice, the Minister of Industry. Minister Prentice is responsible for the Copyright Act in Canada. Despite the fact that Minister Prentice trumpeted his pro-consumer approach on the spectrum auction issue, the rumour mill suggests that he supports DMCA-style reforms and has little interest in advocating for consumer concerns. Minister Prentice’s contact information is here.

# Write to Josee Verner, the Minister of Canadian Heritage. Minister Verner is one of the two ministers responsible for copyright policy in Canada. Prior Canadian Heritage Ministers have been perceived to be close to U.S. copyright lobby groups and copyright collectives. Ministry contact information here. Minister Verner’s contact information is here….

Link (Thanks, Ryan!)

See also:
Canada’s coming DMCA will be the worst copyright yet
Canadian DMCA: how it might have happened
CBC radio show needs your input for question with Minister responsible for Canadian DMCA

Canadian DMCA rally in Calgary — photos, videos, reports

Filed under: Canada,Copyright,Politics — Mike Lawton @ 11:33  

For all my sermonizing, I found myself woefully unaware of the biggest public action on Canada’s proposed new copyright legislation nightmare, happening right outside my door! I was only a couple hours away too, hiking around a serene (if chilly) Lake Louise with Dreamgirl. Damn. I really would have liked to have been there.

Below is a report from those that were there, and I really hope they had the effect they were looking for!

 

via Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow on 12/9/07



Kempton Lam, who organized Saturday’s anti-DMCA rally at Industry Canada Minister Jim Prentice’s office in Calgary, Alberta, has posted a GREAT couple of articles reporting on the day, which looks to have been an unqualified success. The Minister (who was in Calgary for an open house at his constituency office) is introducing copyright legislation that mimics — and exceeds — the worst elements of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998, a law that has resulted in lawsuits against 20,000 music fans, harmed free speech and innovation, and failed completely to enrich any artists or prevent infringement.

Minister Prentice has refused to answer any of the 250+ questions that the CBC Radio programme Search Engine compiled from its readers’ suggestions; and he shut Canadian artists, industry and consumer groups out of the drafting of the bill, writing it with the help of US entertainment giants and the US Trade Representative. The Minister’s office says that consumer interests in the bill will come about as the result of a separate committee, the kind of thing that usually takes a decade to come to fruition in Canadian law.

So on Saturday, some fifty concerned people attended the Minister’s open house and asked him some of the questions that the CBC had compiled. Hundreds more wrote and called the office (I tried to leave a message late on Saturday and found that all three of his office voicemail systems were filled and no longer accepting messages).

Word is that the Minister had no idea that this would be such a big deal for Canadians (the week-old Facebook group for fighting the bill just crested 10,000 members and is growing fast), despite the fact that the last two MPs who tried to introduce a slightly better version of the law ended up losing their jobs.

Word is that the Minister and his advisers are scrambling, rethinking the entire matter because of the public outcry. It’s thanks to you all — everyone who wrote and called, and especially people who went to the Minister’s office on Saturday, and especially Kempton Lam, who organised the whole event. (Be sure to check out all the videos Kempton filmed of Canadians putting questions about the proposal to the Minister)

We’ve killed the Canadian DMCA twice now. We will do it a third time, a fourth, a fifth, and forever, until Canada’s politicians start drafting balanced copyright laws that protect Canadian artists, scholars, critics, schools, libraries, and the public interest. Link to Part 1 of Kempton’s report, Part 2 of Kempton’s report

(Photo credit: _DSC0046 from LiminalMike’s Flickr stream)

See also:
O Canada! The Canadian DMCA version of the national anthem
Canadian DMCA introduced
CANADIANS! Tomorrow is your best chance to fight the Canadian DMCA! Event in Calgary, national phone-in
Canada’s DMCA won’t get any consumer rights added to it for a decade
Facebook group for fighting Canada’s DMCA growing fast
Ranting hand-puppet tackles Canada’s DMCA
HOWTO Fight Canada’s coming DMCA copyright law
Canada’s coming DMCA will be the worst copyright yet
Canadian DMCA: how it might have happened
CBC radio show needs your input for question with Minister responsible for Canadian DMCA
Canadian Industry Minister refuses to defend Canadian DMCA in public

2007
Jul 
16

Canadian Pirates vs American Bull$#!t

Filed under: Canada,Law,Politics — Mike Lawton @ 19:06  

This stuff scares me. Laws are being written by politicians with no clue under the “advice” of corporations with no concern beyond short-term profit maximization/loss minimization, at the expense of long-term industry sustainability, artistic creativity, and most importantly the protection of the public interest.

I honestly believe that if someone was able to effectively communicate to the average consumer (Canadian, American, anywhere!) what was being done to our rights, the sort of common sense, “of course I can do that” stuff that we all take for granted… I dunno. I’m pissed about it, anyone I talk to is either a) also pissed, or b) totally unaware of what’s going on.

Does Joe Public care that he can’t see some of the most amazing movies from around the world, because DVD manufacturers and movie studios have put regional locks on their players in order to manipulate prices on a market-wide scale?

Or that billion-dollar corporations, built from the ground by “re-imagining” classic stories, are trying to make sure that they continue to make money off of the work of artists that have been dead for decades, while also ensuring that no one can ever use their stories to draw inspiration for a new generation?

I am by no means a “burn-the-rich” anarchist. I’m writing this in my office, wearing a suit and tie, all corporate. I believe in business and profit and people getting paid for what they do. However, I do believe that the government is supposed to be there for the service and protection of it’s citizens, to offer a balance against those forces that may reach a tipping point at which they become a detriment to the public good.

via Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow on Jul 12, 2007


Cory Doctorow: Copyfighting law prof Michael Geist and filmmaker Daniel Albahary have put together a great short film called “Putting Canadian ‘Piracy’ in Perspective.” It’s a great, systematic debunking of of the claims that Canada is a haven for piracy, demonstrating that these claims are just scare-tactics from American corporate and government interests looking to change Canadian law to favor American firms to the detriment of the Canadian public. Link (Thanks, Robbo!)

2007
Jun 
27

Legal guide for Canadian podcasters

Filed under: Canada,Law,Politics,Tech — Mike Lawton @ 08:23  

I haven’t really thought of doing a podcast of my own, too many other little projects on the side right now. But it’s always good to keep up to date on the current copyright playground, if for no other reason than to feel smarter than 95% of our media and politicians!

 

via Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow on Jun 27, 2007


Cory Doctorow: Creative Commons Canada has produced a legal guide for Canadian podcasters — here’s how Canadian podcasters can navigate the legal minefields of copyright, libel and so on. Link

See also:
Legal guide for podcasters
EFF legal guide for bloggers
EFF Blogger Legal Guide in your trousers
Legal guide for bloggers covering US Election Day

2007
Jun 
19

Hard Drive? What’s A Hard Drive?

Filed under: Politics,Tech,Useful — Mike Lawton @ 11:54  

Won’t be long before we look back at the idea of storing files and applications on our own individual computers the way we look at having to get up off the couch to change the channel. Ubiquitous, ultra-high-speed, wireless connectivity combined with cheap, convenient dumb terminals of every shape and size, running everything off of web-based services and online data storage.

Could be sweet, if someone finally manages to light a fire under our buttheaded telco monopolies and get them to actually offer decent service instead of the global embaressment that is our current lot! Is it too much to ask for a pricing structure that is at least as fair as those in 3rd world dictatorships!?

Bah, I’d be happy if just ONE of our major carriers offered an unlimited data plan…

 

Web As Desktop: 20 Web operating systems reviewed

via Lifehacker by Kyle Pott on Jun 19, 2007


Web-As-Desktop.png

The Frantic Industries weblog has a two part series that reviews 20 web operating systems. A few weeks ago we introduced Desktoptwo and received bunches of comments and questions about other web operating systems. The review done by Frantic Industries does an excellent job of introducing each web OS and giving a rundown of the pros and cons. If you’ve been searching for a usable web OS, give the Frantic Industries articles a read and let us know which OS you prefer and why.

2007
May 
20

"A Fair(y) Use Tale"

Filed under: Law,Movies,Politics — Mike Lawton @ 16:02  

This is sheer genius… the best explanation of how copyright laws work that I’ve ever seen. And the way this guy did it. Wow. You have to see this.

Fair(y) Use Tale: AMAZING video cuts up Disney to explain copyright

via Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow on May 19, 2007


Cory Doctorow: Bucknell prof Eric Faden has produced the most amazing video mashup I’ve ever seen: “A Fair(y) Use Tale” cuts together thousands of extremely short clips from dozens of Disney cartoons, lifting indivudal words and short phrases to spell out an articulate, funny, and thoroughly educational lesson on how copyright works. This is the most subversive and hilarious use of Disney material I’ve ever seen — and there’s even a really smart chapter about why Faden used Disney material to make his film. This should be required viewing in every K-12 classroom in the country. Coral Cache link to MP4 download, Link to Stanford page for the film (Thanks, Church!)

Update: Here’s the YouTube version — thanks, Pawel!

Update 2: Here’s another mirror, courtesy of Alan

2007
May 
4

Buy Your Own Politician (in Canada They’re Cheap!)

Filed under: Politics — Mike Lawton @ 07:36  

Not just accepting bribes, but actively soliciting donations from the very industry she is supposed to be regulating for the benefit of the public. It’s so blatantly corrupt, you’d think it came straight from a movie script out of one of Ms. Oda’s “campaign partners”.

We’re watching…

Canada's copyright czar lied about money from entertainment execs

via Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow on May 04, 2007


Cory Doctorow: Bev Oda, the Canadian minister in charge of copyright, has been caught taking funds from the entertainment companies she is supposed to regulate. Oda financed her campaign with giant, unseemly donations from the entertainment and pharmaceutical companies — many of them US-based — and was then embarrassed when it was revealed that she planned a $250/plate fundraiser, while in office, just two weeks before a major review of Canada’s broadcasters.