As the movie & comic geeks amoung us get ready for the premiere of the big-screen adaptation of Alan Moore’s legendary graphic novel “V for Vendetta” by the equally famous/infamous Wachowski brothers, many have turned to the Wachowski’s other well known sci-fi comic adaptation for hints as to how they will handle this highly respected material.
I am a rabid, unapologetic Matrix fanatic. I love every part of the epic trilogy, as well as the supplementary “Animatrix” shorts. I love the world and mythologies created. I love the source material, inspired works, and philosophical studies done on it all. I love that we will still be discussing these stories for years to come.

I will fully admit there are flaws (why did they even bother suggesting werewolves?), but for me they don’t detract from the overall narrative, which in my opinion is, without hyperbole, one of the greatest ever put to screen.
This has come to mind because of a recent article posted on Ain’t It Cool looking at the oft-maligned second and third films of the trilogy. I agree wholeheartedly with the author’s assertation regarding the overblown expectations of the general public being primarly responsible for the lukewarm reception of “Reloaded”. I would reach even further by suggesting that the “pop” popularity of the first film opened the doors for the much of the wrong audience in the sequels. The Matrix trilogy is a heavy, philisophical, sci-fi geek movie. The first one was accessible enough to the general public that many people who otherwise would never be interested in the genre became so. However, as the second and third films dove deeper into the essence of their story and style, these people were simply reminded of what they found distasteful of “that kind of movie” in the first place. Had the first film not reached such a broad audience, I believe firmly that the entire trilogy would be canonized as the true cult classic it deserves to be.
Below is an excerpt from the article speaking about one of the most often criticized scene in “Reloaded”, that of the celebration/dance/rave. I was so happy to read this, because the first time I watched it in the theatre I totally “got it”. I knew exactly what I thought they were trying to say with the sequence (ie: humanity vs technology, warmth vs cold, flesh and sweat vs steel and oil, the essence of humanity surviving despite everything), and I felt they succeeded. Since then, however, I have felt like the ONLY one who did!

“The infamous celebration in Zion is perhaps the most unfairly maligned sequence in the entire film. The summation of poor sequences leading up to the celebration made it an easy target for strong resentment and complaint. The celebration itself is one of the most intriguing, well paced, and symbolic moments in the story. For a film dealing with concepts of war and death, the dance in Zion is a spectacular demonstration of the body and soul, a uniquely human trait intensely portrayed by an energetic crowd of free spirits. The dance is sensual, sexual, alive, emotional, and dangerous. The feeling of death and destruction looms over every movement – movement that represents the purest and most simplistic joy of the human spirit. Most importantly, it brings a feeling of togetherness and communion through the beauty and elegance of pulsating liveliness. The dance is beautifully intercut with another criterion of human passion, a love sequence between Neo and Trinity. The imagery is exquisitely interwoven, resulting in a fairly potent piece of human symbolism and metaphor.
Cinematographer Bill Pope does magnificent work in the entire trilogy, and this particular sequence represents the best of his abilities. He and uber production designer Owen Paterson bring a sufficiently earthy, dark, almost claustrophobic atmosphere to Zion, and this section demonstrates just how vital their contributions are in envisioning this world. And while Morpheus’ thunderous speech is undeniably awkward at specific moments, it’s still effective at presenting his passion for freedom and peace with his fierce leadership. Most special about this segment is a tender moment shared between Neo and Trinity after they’ve made love. This is precisely the emotional content necessary at this point in the story. It’s soft and sweet, a powerful reminder of how close and special they mean to each other. It also returns the focus on Neo, the character that leads the story.”

3D Sidewalk Art
“Religion’s Guided Missles” by Richard Dawkins
Cuppycake Gumdrop Snoogums
1001 Things to do with Liquid Nitrogen
Unlost Camera: One Family Giving Canadians A Bad Name
Malcolm Gladwell’s Blog
